Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 03.07.2025 00:28

Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Putin's uncompromising demands emerge after the latest round of Russia-Ukraine peace talks - AP News
Thank you.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
NASA video of moon rocket test shows something just went seriously wrong - Mashable
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
What’s next?
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Why is there a housing crisis in Europe?
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
The FDA Launches Its Generative-AI Tool, Elsa, Ahead of Schedule - Gizmodo
Russia can stop this any time.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Just in the last 5 years:
JWST captures its most extreme gravitational lens ever - Big Think
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
How do I get rid of a cold in 1 day?
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?